I think "perfect output" would be to reproduce the input on paper as precisely as real-world hardware constraints permit. This here is no longer useful as a printer.
I can kinda see why they are doing this but it's still deeply annoying, when all I really want from the printer industry is a printer that prints.
Why would anyone want a printer that decides to print something different than what you sent it? Aren't these things unreliable enough as is?
No effing way do I want my printed text to go through some LLM, even if it's just for design/layout purposes.
Just waiting for some HP Clippy-clone with HAL 9000 voice. "I'm sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t print that"
While the mechanical part is OK, the software and consumable ecosystem is insanity.
They might think AI will fix it but is gonna be without me.
What I expect it means: What You See Is What You Get to the extreme. Absolutely predictable printing.
What HP, instead, thinks: What the actual fuck.
This kind of thing should be done in the application or maybe the driver, not the printer.
HP appears to integrate anything that is riding the hype. Thankfully, from one of their hype I have one of the best printers they ever made so I suppose, sometimes food things come out of hype.
[1] https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres...