Is this the result of a team solely consisting of "A-players" who "learn from mistakes"? The document cites previous failures such as "Do not leave consteatants [sic] waiting in the sun (ideally waiting in general) for more than 3 hours."
Among other things, I'd say: these types of documents rarely bear any relation to the reality of a company.
How are they measuring this?
> Earlier in July, Medics on the Go collaborated with doctors stationed nationwide, eliminating applicants based on their medical records who they felt could be at risk during the competition. At the time, April said Medics on the Go was not privy to age information. April said pharmacy medics learned of the contestant’s age when they first visited the pharmacy and shared their identification wristbands.
> Recalling one healthy 82-year-old lady, April said, “She got banged up and scratched up when it comes to money, people are ruthless.”
I hated reading this article. Disgusting behavior by a YouTube star who will be spared all consequences.
> “One contestant had a seizure; they just left him there,” said Hannah, describing one of the seizure incidents. Medical attention wasn’t brought to them until nearly an hour later, she said.
Holy cow. This feels sort of like fyre festival, but it's hard to tell precisely what is going on here. This team has run big productions before, supposedly?