luizfelberti
> Then a couple of weeks ago, added [direct] links to the Wayback Machine

Hopefully they are also making substantial donations to the Internet Archive, since they will be directing a lot of traffic into it and basically using their infrastructure as a feature on their main product...

EDIT:

Apparently they are collaborating but there are not much details [0]

[0] https://blog.archive.org/2024/09/11/new-feature-alert-access...

runxel
Very sad to see it gone. It was always some kind of last resort. Internet Archive is lovely, don't get me wrong, but it relies mostly on people actively queueing up sites to save.

So most of the time for more obscure sites where the bitrot was already in place and they aren't loading anymore you could use the Google cache to get something out of it – where IA had nothing.

iamleppert
Google Cache was useful because you could sometimes not find a term or keyword in the web site, but it would be in the cache. Or for sites that have gone offline, or no longer have the item. "It's still in the Google Cache!" you can't say that anymore.

I use Google less and less these days. What's the point when you can just ask an LLM, and it gives you an answer within seconds, with no ads? You can ask for references and links and it will give those to you too. I don't think I've ever been given a link to an SEO content farm, where as with Google search its the entire page. Google Search feels like Yahoo was (maybe even worse) right before it died and was replaced with Bing.

cyberax
I used cache a lot, not just to view sites, but see the text versions of PDF and Word documents. RIP.
ThinkBeat
I would presume Google still has all this data. They just will not let anyone else use it.

Could this be an advantage that Google can use to train their models on but others won't have access?

Google wants it to be more difficult to notice rewrites? Journalists to often have found valuable information with it?

bigstrat2003
I am genuinely surprised to learn that it even still existed. I'm pretty sure it's been years since I have seen a Google result which actually had a cached version for me to pull up.
JonChesterfield
One fewer reason to use Google search. Solid effort killing the money printer all around.
RachelF
Sadly, not knowing what used to be, erases history.

“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.” ― George Orwell, 1984

sandyarmstrong
This was really useful when looking for product support, as companies regularly pull down or move around pages on their website. Seeing the version of a page at the time google associated it as a result was something I did all the time.
arshdeep79
Ah the memories! I remember in my starting years. I was migrating a WordPress to new server. The db backup got corrupted in the process. Google cache helped me restore the blog entries. Crazy days!
xnx
Any solid evidence on why, or why now? I have to assume the additional interest in crawling/scraping data for AI precipitated this. Why deal with all the messiness of crawling the web at large when you can use a Google search and cache: results as your RAG?
0x_rs
Too bad. It was a great complement to the increasingly unreliable IA, whose list of blacklisted websites just keeps skyrocketing for opaque reasons. I'm guessing it's still available internally, along with snapshots going far, far back in time.
mattigames
Many years ago Google Cache once saved a site I used to maintain/own, classic funny story, I accidentally deleted the production database when I was trying migrate it, but luckily all the data to recreate the latest posts (the most important for this japanese music-downloads-links WordPress site) was stored all in HTML attributes and some tags, so I created a script to scrap it all from Google Cache and recreated the DB as best as I could.
nashashmi
What are the chances of wayback machine removing snapshots? I found an article on something that is far too taboo to talk about these days that was removed from the newspaper after having it there for more than 5 years. Out of public pressure.
matt-p
On a unrelated note, could IA be charging companies training AI for access to an API with all thier data, or a enormous data dump?

Presumably historical context is quite useful for so e cases and if they can access new content like books etc then that'd be another benifit.

It is a win win for site owners who currently have everyone and thier dog crawling thier site at the moment.

blackeyeblitzar
I really don’t understand killing this useful feature. Between this and the search results being bad, I don’t have much of a reason to visit Google anymore.
probably_wrong
> [Google Cache] was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn't depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it.

I wish I knew what he's talking about - not only are sites disappearing left and right, but even those that remain will often change so quickly that your search term is nowhere to be found.

My cynical guess: websites want Google to index them so they show full versions of their articles knowing they won't be penalized for that. Everybody else gets a paywall, but Google Cache let everyone bypass them. Faced with the choice between users and companies, Google threw the users under the bus.

Arbortheus
That’s sad. I liked that feature a lot.
Giorgi
Cache was invaluable tool for journalists over the world, especially in todays fast-moving, information overload world where powerful people try to rewrite history all the time. It sucks.

Sometimes I wonder if it really was a burden for a Google?

account42
> Google has now totally disabled the Google Cache from completely working.

What kind of word stuffing monstrosity is this.

nomilk
Can someone ELI5 what google cache was and why it was important? Was it essentially a wayback machine alternative? People are upset about its removal; curious to understand why.
AbstractH24
Do any other search engines have an equivalent feature?

IA is great, but doesn’t always crawl things like news articles as frequently as Google does.

jordemort
Who's taking odds on when they shut down search?
DataDaemon
The question is, what is not dead in Google?
pmarreck
The least they could do is financially and perhaps operationally support The Internet Archive instead
bananapub
quite a surreal change; is it just that the CFO's endless cost cutting has reached this? did it just hit serving or actually maintaining the data? one has to assume you'd have seen a VP of search resign if it was the latter.
zoobab
HTTP was not designed to resist a nuclear attack.

So easy to make some content disseapear.

rustdeveloper
This is a terrible news :( I know it was an option for web scraping and I used in once. I’m curious what is the real reason they took it down.
terrycody
What were they thinking?!
bomewish
What on earth is wrong with that company? This is just so incredibly brain dead.
fngjdflmdflg
I'm surprised it took them this long. I like many others used it to view paid articles for free. I imagine paywalled sites didn't like that and told them to shut it down.
xwat
Another useful feature gone, I relied on the cache many times in the past 15 years (almost on a daily basis), it will be missed.
alexcook111
yeah true because when I am checking it on my site it is disabled. https://www.dotcom-tools.com/website-speed-test
faangguyindia
I hardly use Google search anymore. I think Google search wil also be dead soo .

For long time I had to suffix "reddit", to every search query I make because of absolute garbage results I get from Google of blogspam and adverts everywhere.

Now I only use LLMs and maybe perplexity sometimes.

Unfortunately, Google's time is over.

jjbinx007
Is anyone at Google even aware how much this hurts their brand?

I received an email from Google today with the subject line "Meet the new Google TV Streamer (4K)"

The sender was Google Chromecast. Apparently it's some sort of streaming hardware they are selling for £99.

I won't even consider buying one. How long until it's an obsolete brick? And when it's a brick, what are the chances I can wipe it and install my own software on it? Probably zero.

No thanks, Google. You've blotched your copybook too many times.

pydry
Enshittification
jjbinx007
I guess that's another one to add to the list:

https://killedbygoogle.com/

throwaway984393
[dead]
rkagerer
This a shame. It's really annoying getting a Google result snippet that contains your search phrase, but when you click the link is nowhere to be found in the content of the page (e.g. because sever rendered differently for you than the crawl agent).

Cache was a great way to find what you're actually looking for in cases like these.

helf
[dead]
whydoineedthis
What was it?
irrational
I'm pretty sure that Google's main business is cancelling products. Things like search and ads are just side gigs.
readyplayernull
Nowadays my browser's home page is one of the LLMs. It's easier to get knowledge with an AI than the dead Internet to which Google contributed.