I’ve told this story before but I’ll tell it again - Jurassic Park got me into programming!

I was 7 when it came out, and when I saw that one scene with the 3D fly over of the clouds in the approaching storm, I was hooked. Hooked like “I MUST build this”

I started learning C, I downloaded NOAA weather satellite images from school and took them home on floppy disk. I started learning OpenGL (this was a few years later) over the course of many years I learned how to read a JPEG in C, how to denoise it, how to convert it to a height map, and how to animate a fly-over of it.

I think I saw “segmentation fault (core dumped)” about 50,000 times over the 8ish years it took me to build from ages 8-15 or so. It was funny because I had to learn the basics of trigonometry before they taught it to me in school, when it got to that I was like “ohhhhhhh i wish you had shown me this sooner this is really useful!!!” While the other kids were still complaining “when will we ever use this?!”

There’s a quote from the game civilisation that I love “instruct the children not to dream of toys or sweets, instruct them to dream of infrastructure” - I wish we had more scifi like Jurassic park that inspires our young <3

Children, generally, do not read academic papers.

It would be cool if there was some data to back this up, but it's impossible to get. It's really about young people being impressionable and having the mindset to be inspired by something such that they'll dedicate their mind to it.

Video games inspired more people to get into computer science than any white paper.

Lots of finance people from an earlier era ended up there from the movie Wall Street which is hilarious since it was not intended as something glorifying the sector

> Jurassic Park inspired more people to go into biotech than any academic paper. The Matrix inspired more people to go into computer science than any GitHub repo. The Martian inspired more people to go into aerospace engineering than any industry trend report.

> Science fiction doesn’t predict the future, it does something much more interesting: tell stories about technology so compelling that people dedicate their lives to advancing the frontier.

How many fewer people would have gone into biotech had Watson and Crick never published their helical DNA paper?

How many fewer people would have gone into biotech had Jurassic Park never been made?

I have no idea how you compare those counter-factuals.

Had Watson and Crick not published that paper, someone else would have.

Had Jurassic Park not been made, what other movie might have inspired future biotech people?

[citation needed]

Also, very low quality post, amounting to just a tweet, and an unsubstantiated one at that.

Twitter doesn’t work for me, is the post about the movie or the book?

I'd say Moneyball made statistics kind of cool for a bit. It would have inspired a lot of people to get in to sports analytics.

For me it was hackers (1995) but after I got triggered Matrix had a huge influence in my mindset.

I am doubtful. Is there anyone here who got into computer science because of The Matrix?

Wanting to recreate a sci-fi subplot irl can only get you so far, especially in an engineering field.

These movies are of course loved by all the nerds, me included; but I’d guess the causality is different than what the twitter poster suggests.

> tell stories about technology so compelling that people dedicate their lives to advancing the frontier

Not to mention that the point of a lot of these stories was to not advance the frontier in that particular direction.

Reminds me of how many lawyers have been inspired by Atticus Finch.

[dead]

a tweet of unsubstantial claims, how impressive and thought provoking /s