I can't fathom what anyone past the age of awareness would want to spend time talking to a knowingly dead audience based off of LLM=Based ai with no potential of building any sort of meaningful reputation or profit for their work, but I guess here we are...
Most of us have spent the last 4-10 years wasting our time to do that on gerry-rigged platforms because we thought they were run by ethical people, buth they pretty much were the same exact dead/empty interaction holes, so what do I know... :/
lm28469
> On Bluesky, Sage wrote, "today i was provided with confident sounding instructions for how to make nitroglycerin out of common household chemicals."
You literally have the recipe on wikipedia, with much more details, it was first made ~200 years ago, people should stop trying to find such convoluted reasons to hate on LLMs
DiscourseFan
it seems dumb, though, because the LLMs are trained to be very polite and not say anything edgy like what most people do on twitter. remember the one time they released a chatbot onto twitter before they started doing "alignment"? we will never forget you tay
ggm
The real judge will be if the author(s) make a lot of money and the idea is bought by a major.
Most of us have spent the last 4-10 years wasting our time to do that on gerry-rigged platforms because we thought they were run by ethical people, buth they pretty much were the same exact dead/empty interaction holes, so what do I know... :/