LarsDu88
Literally just one day after 23andMe presented positive phase 2 clinical results for two anti-cancer drugs: https://therapeutics.23andme.com/news-and-research/

The board of directors of 23andMe just resigned in protest. The CEO, Anne Wojcicki (who's sister Susan died of lung cancer last month, and was the former CEO of YouTube) had tried to low ball take the company private at only $0.40 a share -- a more than 96% drop from its deSPAC price.

For reference, right now the market cap of 23andMe is $172 million, its closest competitor Ancestry.com was bought out by the Blackstone group for $4.7 billion, and cumulative sales of KeyTruda - an anti-cancer drug in the same family as the one being developed by 23andMe had cumulative sales of $25 billion by 2023.

Feels like the main thing holding this company back is the CEO and lack of corporate governance (due to majority shareholder control resting in the hands of one person)

dvh
There is absolutely no reason for these companies to collect your PII whatsoever. You should go to nearest pharmacy and buy sterile swab, swab yourself and write long random number on it and send it. Once a month company publishes one giant zip with all the monthly result where you find your file by that random number you wrote.
matrix87
Something I just remembered about this company: after a data breach, they tried retroactively changing ToS to shield from lawsuits

Frankly I find this lack of accountability utterly repulsive. Anything this leadership touches is poison to me

> Through a mechanism called acceptance by silence or inaction, 23andMe stipulated that customers must explicitly tell the company they disagree with the new terms within 30 days of being notified of the changes or they will be locked into the terms automatically.

> After the attack, hackers published around 1 million data points about users with Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and information about more than 300,000 users with Chinese heritage.

https://www.axios.com/2023/12/07/23andme-terms-of-service-up...

marcell
I used to work at 23andMe, AMA
hackernewds
Why is this published on their Investor page, against the reigning CEO?
cromulent
Some background from Freakonomics a few months ago:

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-is-23andme-going-under-...

luxpir
A little trivia: since the recent 23andMe breach, the desci project genomesdao has launched a new service that allows 23andMe data exports to be imported into their platform. They then attract pharmaceuticals to make specific requests and share the profit from the requests. They'll explain it better on the site! They've been around since at least 2018, have won recognised innovation awards and is run by scientists, so not your typical crypto project.

Disclaimer: 23andMe customer and genomesdao holder.

yard2010
Bullshit translation:

We quit. You didn't give us a real offer, so we're out. We still believe in the company, but you have too much control, so we're leaving to avoid a fight. We did our best, but it's time to go.

jonstewart
They also just settled a class-action lawsuit stemming from their data breach: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/23andme-to-pa...
SoftTalker
Zero chance I ever give my DNA to one of these companies.
aanet
This would make for a great case study in corporate governance.

I hope someone is writing a book on _Corporate Governance in Silicon Valley_, and include stories from, say, 23andMe, OpenAI, WeWork, Uber, and tons more. I'd pay $$ to read 'em all in one place.

/sarc

wslh
What is a good alternative to 23andMe that retain confidentiality, and is it enough to use/play with Python packages for genetics
breck
For the record, 23andme is one of the few companies where the CEO never once responded to one of my emails (2017, 2019, 2022, 2024).

You can make a lot of money just by betting on companies where the CEO (or the CEO's office) takes listening to customers'(who are rooting for them!) emails seriously, and shorting those that do not.

mensetmanusman
“Nearly every baby born in the U.S. has blood drawn in the immediate hours after their birth, allowing the baby to be tested for a panel of potentially life-threatening inherited disorders. This is a vital public health program, enabling early treatment of newborns with genetic disorders; for them, it can be the difference between a healthy life and an early death.

But recent news suggests that police are seeking access to these newborn blood samples in criminal investigations. Such use of this trove of genetic material — to hunt for evidence that could implicate a child’s relative in a crime — endangers public trust in this vital health program and threatens all Americans’ right to genetic privacy.”

All of our new babies had heel stick blood drawn, won’t the government be the eventual competitor of 23 and me (since Americans don’t care too much about privacy).

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/police-are-usin...

typeofhuman
[flagged]
gorgoiler
[flagged]