> Like, actually went to the file system, opened a file, and read its content? We already have the file name conveniently stored in file, and luckily Clojure keeps sources around.
> So this is what I ended up with:
> (defn slurp-source [file key]
Looks like a function to me (which is good).
sometimes a vector is just a vector, but sometimes it’s a UI component and shows the structure of the UI.
Easily the worst aspect of Clojure. Everything is an untyped map or an untyped vector. Your editor can't tell the difference between a vector of keywords and some DSL for a macro. Things like this make Clojure a nightmare to refactor and scale poorly relative to languages like TypeScript.
$ cat slurp-source.tl
(defun slurp-source (path key)
(let* ((lines (file-get-lines path))
(match (member-if (op contains key) lines))
(tail (rest match))
(indent (find-min-key tail : (op match-regex @1 #/\s*/)))
(dedent (mapcar (op drop indent) tail)))
`@{dedent "\n"}\n`))
$ txr -i slurp-source.tl
1> (put-string (slurp-source "slurp-source.tl" "let*"))
(match (member-if (op contains key) lines))
(tail (rest match))
(indent (find-min-key tail : (op match-regex @1 #/\s*/)))
(dedent (mapcar (op drop indent) tail)))
`@{dedent "\n"}\n`))
t
I have done the same with React - but it gets messy. Something nice like in the post would be great for that.
Too often I see very poor Storybook sites in the wild (a web based design system visual explorer, somewhat like the screenshot in the post) where no thought was given to this exact problem.
Instead of something meaningful like in the post, I see:
As the only avaliable code. The point of the code blocks is so people can copy paste. When I see that, I know I'm in for a rough ride because the code quality inevitably isn't any good either.For reference, this is easily the best design system I know of: https://seek-oss.github.io/braid-design-system/components/Te... I use this as a reference when I work on my own.