If you're feeling burnt out on it then just don't pay attention. There's very little reason to at this point in time.
I just tackled an Arduino project for the first time. It was really nice being able to have AI talk me through the process, help me write in C++ which I'm not strong at, and generally be an accessible companion. I took on a project larger than I would've done without AI, and completed it more quickly and with more personal engagement than I would've done prior to LLMs being invented.
I don't think AI is going to magically generate the ROI that the market seems to believe, but it's such a nice modifier to my development process.
I recently had a problem cross my desk which the stakeholders thought might be solvable with an LLM, which may have been true, but ultimately was more easily solved using plain old boring programming techniques. Is that the hype?
While the final solution didn't need to involve LLMs or anything of that nature, I don't think said stakeholders would have been able to even envision the possibility of trying to solve said problem had semi-recent technological developments that has taken on the AI moniker not enabled them to think more creatively about what machines might be able to do. Without that, there is little chance I would have become aware of the problem someone faced.
If that's the AI hype, I'm game. Being able to get computers to do things others didn't think was possible is what brings me to the world of software development.
With all these shallow short/micro “blogging” platforms we made a couple of steps back in cultural development. It’s just too much speech to process properly, and most of it is useless if not harmful.
What I do get tired of seeing are the it's only ML (a bunch of if-then statistics, etc) stories and also some of the "Is AI sentient yet" kinds. The latter stories will be important when non-fringe folks actually believe they are rather than trying to fill news feeds. Stories that try to analyze consciousness of some form and compare biological to machine are very interesting as it's an attempt at expanding our understanding. I suppose learning to skip over the hype is a way to deal with it.
AI R&D definitively has its place but certainly not like this, this feels like just another hype bubble.
A good read explaining some of it: https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/
So I'm only excited about it. Traditional programming is the thing I'm really burnt out about.
You might enjoy the talk Adam Conover had with Ed Zitron[2]; I found it quite cathartic.
1: https://ifdesign.com/en/winner-ranking/project/ai-rice-cooke...
It's good technology still, but the hype is doing more harm than good and it looks very fragile. I recommended to concentrate on different marketing terms like vision, chatbot, etc.
I hope other people are burned out on it and not using it — I’ll be happy being the only one taking all the benefits :)
Get on with it. There’s always trends you don’t like. If I felt burnt out when I see a trend I don’t like, I’ll be so burnt that I’m in an urn right now.
At the same time I do think it's an incredible tool, and I personally do use it, as a sparring partner, to do quick experiments, to explore ideas or technology I don't have experience with. For example, in my current position I found myself constantly hitting limits with excel. AI enabled me to use Python, Pandas, Sklearn and other libraries to great effect. All stuff I didn't have prior experience with. So I understand the excitement.
Like holy fucking cringe, enough.
If you aren't at least using AI to generate boiler plate code your already behind.
Of course AI can make mistakes, but it's going to change everything.
I don't like being this way but it's worked through several fads. I'll keep going with my Linux boxes. Y'all keep finding new window dressing.