> After an edit to the Awareness article in May of 2024, among others switching the order of Philosophy and Psychology, the amount of articles that lead to Philosophy this way has been greatly reduced, as Awareness and Psychology form a loop of their own.
The title of the actual linked page is "Getting to Philosophy", which should have been the title as submitted.
Edit: someone from this HN thread found a way to break the cycle, so 97% is back for now!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thought&action=...
Today's top in the news link, Iberian lynx, leads off site (to Wiktionary) on the first link.
I've tried getting to philosophy years ago and it was reliable--but what's up now?
I've not heard people talk about it, but it seems like there's a model of information in the Dewey classification system, where 000 includes information systems and general reference itself, then 100 is philosophy, all the way up to 900, which is history. It's something like abstract ("information" to concrete ("real, specific things that happened"). By this theory, it makes sense that moving up the classification chain would take you to Philosophy, if you go far enough. But if that's what was happening, I'd expect it to keep going beyond Philosophy into the 000s.
Maybe, maybe not. Rather than admit my theory is wrong, I'll just pretend that the substrate on which Philosophy articles are built is Wikipedia, the internet, and other information organizing systems. Thus, all Philosophy articles on Wikipedia have an implied link above them in the classification chain. Phew, crisis averted.