I read this whole article and it’s still not clear to me _why_ they’re slow.
I’m genuinely curious! It seems like this article just lists a bunch of facts about sloths. But doesn’t say why being nearly blind or having a slow metabolism gives any evolutionary advantages.
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34211802-the-unexpected-...
In Brazil you can visit caves featuring scars on the rock from the pre-historic giant sloth’s claws. This funny animal descends from that!
https://oglobo-globo-com.translate.goog/google/amp/brasil/no...
Then again, something similar probably happened many times in evolutionary history, and the victim species died out as a result. So if one of those predators would exist, we wouldn't have sloths. I guess this leaves them vulnerable to invasive species?
Too low contrast; didn't read
https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/pygmy-slow-loris
In America, you can find them at the DC zoo in a shadowed alcove under red light to simulate night time during visiting hours.
But given their lack of thermal regulation, I wonder if this leaves them especially vulnerable to climate change.
Feels like evolution is not as perfect as we want to believe sometimes.
Could something similar happen with sloths? Maybe their eyesight would improve quickly?
Weird phrasing. All of them having something that is rare means it is not rare at all, right? And if all of them have it, it is not a “condition”, it is their genes, how they are.