There are time constraints on the hiring manager/team with the numbers of applicants and legal ramifications for the company if something is misstated or could be construed as against hiring laws.
Developers, despite everything they claim, are more likely to fear confrontation. Denying a person a job is highly confrontational even when exceptionally polite. On the other side of the table it will likely be viewed as an unnecessary inconvenience.
I try to think about this optimistically. I wouldn’t want to work with people who are cowardly about talking to people or expressing business concerns openly. If it’s how they behave during hiring it’s how they will behave at work.
That doesn't make sense to me. You'd think candidates you don't even care to interview would be the ones you'd ignore/ghost, not the ones who are probably in the last 5 or so candidates for the role.
But hey, I guess that sort of strange behaviour isn't entirely new. I still remember getting ghosted by a company that gave me two phone interviews and two in person interviews in the office.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/27/4-in-10-companies-say-theyve...
Recruiters strike again.
Reason 1: It’s generally safer, liability wise to ghost. The more information you share, the more information that can be used against you.
Reason 2: They give feedback and you want to debate why you’re right and why their feedback isn’t valid. They’ve got a job to do that isn’t going back and forth with you.
Reason 3: They just found somebody they liked better for whatever reason and don’t care enough to tell you.
I always write, “Thanks for your time and interest but we’re moving ahead with other candidates.” Any response I get where the first words aren’t “Thank you” gets insta-deleted.
You already answered.
You see yourself as a human being, but companies see you as an asset.
Assets don't have a soul, they don't need feedback, they are just assets, things to be used in their strategy to make profits.
When companies give you feedback they are just saying you are or can be useful for them to reach their goals,just that.
Increasing this cost can make non-ghosting prevalent.
So it's at least 5 times as many applicants per position.
When you got 10 people to pass step 1, and 5 people to pass step 2, and 3 people to pass step 3, its not that hard to send a "thanks but we need someone with xyz skill".
Now, the reasons are even more random and arbitrary.
Now you might have 100 people pass step 1, and 50 people to pass step 2, and 30 people to pass step 3. So companies are pickier, but also they tend to reject you more randomly.
I've done a few interviews and they would say stuff that basically said "i'm not really listening just browsing reddit while you're talking"
Kinda sad