Classic example of why "Person On Twitter Is Angry" being considered newsworthy, or even faintly noteworthy, is one the worst things that has happened to modern discourse.
There's clickbait and there's the plain and simple truth.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-i-built-this-with-...
MKBHD posts a fair and thorough review of a shitty product, which is exactly in line with what every other reviewer has said about it as well.
One guy tweets about how he wasn't fair, and how he has a responsibility to not write bad things about companies because of the size of his viewer base (wut??)
Now the entire internet feels the need to come defend MKBHD, thus amplifying the other side even more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QztFpzKsdeA
It's clearly addressing this controversy.
If your product has only haters, then ya, your product sucks.
The CEO also has a strange, what comes off as egotistical "I worked at Apple" vibe which is very off-putting. Maybe he didn't listen to feedback etc to make the product better?
Also who funds these things. 240 million dollars in funding. This should have been a Kickstarter.
> First, do no harm.
Brownlee's not a doctor. …He's not Spiderman, either, for the record, or at least that we know of.
And "Humane, Inc." isn't his patient, or even a person.
I have a ChatGPT pro subscription, I do machine learning professionally, and I am pretty bullish on the long term benefits of automating a lot of things we waste our time on now. But that is a lot of money for a company which doesn’t seem to deserve it. VCs should be putting money into AI research to build the next DeepMind.
I love a lot of his takes because they make me think but it is clear that he is trying to find some edgy takes that will make people react.
The author seems to be using outrage and dramatic words to get engagement. Based on this article and the views the tweet got, it looks like it is working.
The curious thing is that there is a reply from MKBHD in the thread and the tweet author highlights how MKBHD used a more dramatic title on Youtube and that is the authors gripe.
It it possible that all the only way to get engagement(the author is doing the same thing on his primary social media channel i.e. Twitter and MKBHD on his i.e. Youtube) now a days on your primary social media platform is with dramatic words/titles? Which is what is causing all this friction?
Interestingly, none of the top 10 top-level comments in this thread discuss this point.
Smartphones have become this immovable rock which our lives revolve around. I love that hu.ma.ne, the rabbit R1, or any other brand like them are trying to challenge the status quo, and I wish they can achieve some kind of success quickly; I say quickly because Apple will one day knock on the AI door, and when they do they will most likely slay the competition like they’ve done time and time again with Tablets, Watches, Wireless headphones, professional computing, smartphones, and the slew digital services that power them.
I've watched his videos for many years. I can't imagine him doing a video like this for Pinephone, or another smaller company. But a company founded by 2 ex-Apple execs, with hundreds of millions of dollars in funding, and the sort of marketing Humane have come out with... that's a fair target.
But what appears to be one of the main points is that stratechery and MKBHD are both successful because they speak the truth, and they can speak the truth because they are online.
I quite disagree. MKBHD is more dependent on corporate sponsorship than reviewers were back when consumers had to buy a magazine in order to get access to a review.
the OGs would know when Brownlee would openly criticize Beats headphones before they got acquired by Apple (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsxQxS0AdBY).
although things changed afterwards because of the product quality improved for the money. yet nobody batted an eye back then and Beats only grew bigger.
while i personally think that he has always been soft towards the apple ecosystem, he has been consistent and reviewed things as he would like them.
this entire debate could be summed to him giving his opinion and should be removed from his success.
It is true that AI is providing even more leverage than the other tech layers before it. Probably the same for VR, if it gets adoption. However, the question is :
Will this leverage be concentrated to the point that a few will have control and everyone else will happily comply and execute ?
Or is it the other way around, allowing everyone more freedom and power to create and grow independent wealth, companies or ideas ?
I would love to think the latter but the experience since the dawn of the technology is more the former.
How could we ensure that we are on the path toward 7 billion companies more than the one toward even a fewer number of big companies that control the last layer of tech ?
MKBHD is a tech critic / reviewer / nerd, like Ebert was a movie critic / reviewer / nerd, or Kermode is now. A thing got released, and he's talking about it, and his opinion is his value.
> Vassallo is touching on something profound about Brownlee, that I myself understand intimately: what the Internet has made uniquely possible is total loyalty to your customers, and that is threatening.
What? Threatening to what? Your ability to hoodwink people? Is the implication that because we're all in tech we should make sure to say everything's awesome all the time as some form of truth collusion, so that when we end up releasing our shitty product hopefully everyone will say nice things too?
I’d agree with that sentiment if mkbhd was spreading misinformation; to my knowledge, he isn’t, his influencing is based on good reporting. I see nothing wrong with that.
It’s never irresponsible to tell the public the truth. One might even argue that it’s irresponsible to suggest that people get in the habit of self-censorship simply because they have an audience.
They have a youtube channel: www.youtube.com/@mkbhd
Described as:
MKBHD: Quality Tech Videos | YouTuber | Geek | Consumer Electronics | Tech Head | Internet Personality!
Talk about glass roofs…
Frankly, I feel it did way more damage to him than what he did to Aipin or Fisker, which were already universally panned.
Anyway, I will continue to watch his videos because they are informative and entertaining. Of course I will decide for myself on what I buy and why, because I have a brain and my own agency AND can assess things using my own logic and values.
And please don't tell me you don't notice how a sweetheart he is to Apple and Tesla...
PEACE